From 2c7b529f67ddaae565930217e9a94330cb1dcf16 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jordan <dordsor21@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 20 May 2023 19:56:46 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] fix: create single threaded executor for use with
 non-concurrent generators (#2236)

- Fixes #2228
---
 .../com/fastasyncworldedit/bukkit/adapter/Regenerator.java  | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/worldedit-bukkit/src/main/java/com/fastasyncworldedit/bukkit/adapter/Regenerator.java b/worldedit-bukkit/src/main/java/com/fastasyncworldedit/bukkit/adapter/Regenerator.java
index c95fbc580..7c00ebb2b 100644
--- a/worldedit-bukkit/src/main/java/com/fastasyncworldedit/bukkit/adapter/Regenerator.java
+++ b/worldedit-bukkit/src/main/java/com/fastasyncworldedit/bukkit/adapter/Regenerator.java
@@ -165,7 +165,11 @@ public abstract class Regenerator<IChunkAccess, ProtoChunk extends IChunkAccess,
                     .setNameFormat("fawe-regen-%d")
                     .build()
             );
-        } // else using sequential chunk generation, concurrent not supported
+        } else { // else using sequential chunk generation, concurrent not supported
+            executor = Executors.newSingleThreadExecutor(new ThreadFactoryBuilder()
+                    .setNameFormat("fawe-regen-%d")
+                    .build());
+        }
 
         //TODO: can we get that required radius down without affecting chunk generation (e.g. strucures, features, ...)?
         //for now it is working well and fast, if we are bored in the future we could do the research (a lot of it) to reduce the border radius